In reading posts today I again saw where a grandchild has moved in with a grandparent to care for them. Where are the parents/children in all this? Grandchildren should be able to concentrate on their lives. Quitting jobs so no benefits or contributing to their SS for the future. And believe me 40 yrs goes by faster than you think. I don't feel that adult children should be made responsible financially for parents or have to live with the 24/7 to caring for them. But I do feel they have a responsibility to see a parent gets the proper care. Either setting something up in the home or seeing they are safe in an AL or NH. I feel there should be something between a POA and guardianship when it's deemed someone can no longer stay in their own home. So these caregivers with stubborn parents have another avenue. But to have a grandchild take on this responsibility just doesn't seem right.
Next time I see such a post, I need to ask what is their age, as a Grandchild can be anywhere from 13 to 60 years old [60 if the grandparent is late 90's].
That is a scary thought, indeed! People are living longer and longer, many in such compromised conditions. Younger folk often live far away from their families, so I really do wonder how the authors of that article expect it will all play out.
Things have now gone from bad to worse with both of them where they refuse to shower/bathe and staff have noticed that they wear the same clothes day after day and she has a very bad odour coming from her. I have been at my wits end with them both trying to get them to accept the help from both the staff and other agencies but they both say they are accepting help and don't see what the problem is.....we know they are lying. They both have dementia and are 93 and 83 respectively.
I also have to take care of my husband who, in this past year, has had many health problems including a diagnosis of dementia and I got to the point of almost making myself sick over this whole situation. They told me that they don't want to live where they are and are going to move back into an apartment.....both of them can hardly walk anymore. I told them to go for it but don't ask for any help moving, in fact I have decided not to help them anymore, if they're so independent then they won't need my help. The only thing I will do for them now is to shop for a couple of items they need and will no longer be at their beck and call. I told them I will no longer do their laundry and they will now have to use the laundry service the home offers and will have to pay for it. In this past month she has only given me one small load of laundry because they hang their dirty pants and sweaters back in their closet.
The home knows about all of these problems and agrees that I have to take a step back now before I make myself sick.
I have learnt that you can't make anyone take a shower/bath but the home keeps on trying and will continue to offer their assistance.
For myself, I hope to get cancer and move to Oregon. I do not want my daughter or any children she may have to be caregivers. I'm sole caregiver for my mother, and my daughter is in college out of state, in a demanding program, on scholarship, and she is in no position to be involved, and I don't want her to. It makes sense if grandchildren live nearby and are in a position to help, and can get paid to be family caregivers, but many are not.
I wonder if eventually Medicaid will go bankrupt, and what will happen to all the destitute, demented elderly? Maybe expanding assisted suicide will be the only option. I read somewhere that 40% of Americans would have difficulty putting together $500 cash for an emergency. And we're supposed to save for elder care? Really?
Imo, what we really need are tribes, not families. Native Americans got that right, with the tribe rather than the family as the primary social unit.
I took care of my father while raising my granddaughter and i cant tell you how many people would ask me why i didnt work.. are you serious. ??Those two jobs were the hardest ive ever had, but i wouldnt trade one second of it. I did miss out on ten years social security deductions and its hurting me now. I'll work it out somehow.
My granddaughter is working and a mother of two beautiful little girls
My father passed away but i was with him when he passed. He was not only my dad but one of my best friends.
Social security should take in account of people who raise grandchildren and r caregivers for their family members. God knows its saving the govt money.
You assert as a fact that it is our responsibility to take care of our elderly parents, but that is not a fact. It's only your opinion, or belief. Reasonable people can differ on this. Imagine there is only one surviving child, age 60, and he has cancer or some other debilitating disease. Or his spouse does. Do you still hold the same belief? Whose responsibility is it then? What if there are no surviving children? What then?
Just because taking care of elders at home works well for some people (like you) , doesn't mean it works well, or is even workable for other people. Any hard and fast rule you want to make about it just won't wash.
Who do I think is responsible for elderly people? Nobody. Who should take care of them? Whoever chooses to. I don't think my mother is my responsibility. I didn't give birth to her, adopt her, or marry her. I didn't make any deal with her like an inheritance in exchange for care. I take care of her because somebody has to do it, and there is no decent alternative.
I can't say it's society's responsibility. I can say I would prefer to live under a system where we as a society take care of the needy, to a reasonable extent. I would vote for candidates who support policies that provide basic care for everyone.
I also think that people have a responsibility to provide for their own futures, to the extent they can. Someone who becomes disabled at a young age doesn't have that opportunity, but most people have a whole working lifetime to save for retirement. My mother didn't spend all her money taking care of us kids. The last kid left the house when she was 50, and working. She had a long time to provide for her future, except she didn't do it. She even got an inheritance from her parents, but she used that to fund her early retirement before her pension and SS kicked in. If she had worked a few more years and saved that inheritance she could have provided her own care. But she arrived at old age needing a lot of care and without a dime to spare. I don't think society should condone that. I don't think that's okay, not unless you're willing to live with the consequences of those decisions, and willing to manage the best you can without expecting anyone else, even family, to pick up the slack.
Our bodies are living a lot longer, though our minds may not be. We are also taking a lot longer to die. The medical profession has given us this ‘blessing’, and the impact on society is frightening. The Bible gave us ‘three score years and ten’. Old people were not taken care of by ‘the tribe’ (ie someone else), but usually by an unmarried daughter. My mother’s mother got married aged 40 when she was finally free. Just in time for Mum!
I have puzzled about why people died earlier and why death came quicker. There were untreatable illnesses, like pneumonia (‘the old man’s friend’) and cancer. There were uncontrolled conditions like high blood pressure and cholesterol, leading to strokes and heart attacks. Most often, old people just got weaker because they didn’t want to eat much and there wasn’t the time to spoon feed them special diets. Without one-on-one supervision, it was also common for them to wander, fall and not be found in time. ‘Better care’ is keeping all of us alive longer, even though few of us want to be a burden on our children and grandchildren, or to find ourselves in a ‘good’ nursing home.
I am Australian, and I think things are not quite so far down the track here. But the demographics are changing the same way, with fewer young taxpayers and more very elderly people needing high cost care. Our governments seem to have no suggestions except to increase immigration of younger people to pay more taxes. My personal preference is for a palliative care option in nursing homes (currently it’s only available if you have a terminal illness), and for the right to die by assisted suicide. The choice would affect only me, and I am so sorry that institutionalised Religion has effectively blocked laws for that choice. I have done the best I could for older relatives, but I can’t say what other people should do, only me.
Then back another generation, my family tree on my Dad's side, many were farmers and it wasn't unusual for couples to have 10 to 15 children [yes, some didn't live past 1 or 2 years old], thus when the parents became elderly, there was a mob of grown children with their spouses to help. Or a daughter who never married. Plus almost everyone lived in the same small towns or very nearby communities. Back then, no social security [1935] nor Medicare [1966] or Medicaid [1965].
Many lived to be in their 80's and 90's. One great-aunt lived to 103, guess her secret was to never get married :P Hardly any of the old timers had memory issues. The family lineage showed heart conditions were the cause of death on my Dad's side.
Now when it comes to the previous generation saving towards retirement, my parents had 4 children. Dad had a job where he made a living wage. We lived from pay to pay. He Didn't want Mom working while we were in school. By the time the last child graduated from high school, my Dad was on SSD for heart disease. Mom then became his caretaker. There was never any extra money. The money Mom did have to put her into an AL came from Dads life insurance she put in CDs.
Everyone's situation is different. What works for one Doesn't work for everyone. We do what we have to.